← Back to results
Vulnerability record · public intelligence
CVE-2026-82310
HIGH

Apache Airflow FAB provider: FAB auth manager: deactivated users retain and renew Core API JWT access

Published Sep 16, 2026 · Updated Nov 3, 2026

Severity · CVSSHIGH · Not scored
Known exploitationNot listed
EPSS / likelihood1.00%
QFinch risk scoreNot available

Original summary

Normalized public record · Updated Nov 3, 2026

Apache Airflow FAB provider: FAB auth manager: deactivated users retain and renew Core API JWT access

Publisher and source text is retained separately from QFinch interpretation.

QFinch assessment

Apache Airflow FAB provider: deactivating a user account does not stop tokens issued to that account before deactivation. Password authentication correctly rejects the disabled account, but the Core API continues to accept an existing, unexpired token naming it, and lets that token mint a replacement — so the account keeps its role-scoped access indefinitely after an administrator has disabled it. The user replays their own legitimate credential; no signature forgery or privilege escalation is involved, and the access stays within the roles the account already held.

Evidence: public source records

Affected products

Affected scope reported by the available public evidence
Affected package, product or rangeFix status
Consult the referenced vendor advisory for affected versions.Consult source advisory

Matching a version is only one part of assessing exposure. QFinch has not assessed your environment on this public page.

Remediation

Apply the vendor-supported fixed release or mitigation, then verify the affected component is no longer reachable.

  1. Confirm the affected product and reachable code path exist in your environment.
  2. Apply the vendor-supported patch or mitigation from the primary advisory.
  3. Rescan the exact deployed revision and retain verification evidence.
Review primary references

Evidence coverage

FIRST-EPSSCVE-LIST-V5
SSVC priority
MEDIUM
Confidence
Not available
Aliases
None reported

Scores appear only when corresponding evidence exists. Missing data is never interpreted as zero risk.

Sources and record history

  1. GitHub advisory ↗
  2. lists.apache.org ↗
  3. lists.apache.org ↗
  4. www.openwall.com ↗

Record history

Published Sep 16, 2026 · Last refreshed Nov 3, 2026