← Back to results
Vulnerability record · public intelligence
CVE-2026-75148
MEDIUM

cgltf 1.15 Integer Overflow via cgltf_validate() Accessor Bounds Check

Published Aug 19, 2026 · Updated Oct 22, 2026

Severity · CVSSMEDIUM · 6.1
Known exploitationNot listed
EPSS / likelihood0.20%
QFinch risk scoreNot available

Original summary

Normalized public record · Updated Oct 22, 2026

cgltf 1.15 Integer Overflow via cgltf_validate() Accessor Bounds Check

Publisher and source text is retained separately from QFinch interpretation.

QFinch assessment

cgltf through 1.15 contains an integer overflow vulnerability in the non-sparse accessor bounds check within cgltf_validate() that allows remote attackers to cause memory disclosure and denial of service by supplying crafted accessor count values. Attackers can provide malformed .gltf or .glb input with a specially crafted accessor count to overflow the unsigned integer multiplication of accessor stride and element count, causing the bounds check to pass and triggering a heap out-of-bounds read when cgltf_accessor_read_float() is subsequently called on the validated malformed accessor.

Evidence: public source records

Affected products

Affected scope reported by the available public evidence
Affected package, product or rangeFix status
Consult the referenced vendor advisory for affected versions.Consult source advisory

Matching a version is only one part of assessing exposure. QFinch has not assessed your environment on this public page.

Remediation

Apply the vendor-supported fixed release or mitigation, then verify the affected component is no longer reachable.

  1. Confirm the affected product and reachable code path exist in your environment.
  2. Apply the vendor-supported patch or mitigation from the primary advisory.
  3. Rescan the exact deployed revision and retain verification evidence.
Review primary references

Evidence coverage

CVENVDEPSS
SSVC priority
LOW
Confidence
Not available
Aliases
None reported

Scores appear only when corresponding evidence exists. Missing data is never interpreted as zero risk.

Sources and record history

  1. GitHub advisory ↗
  2. www.vulncheck.com ↗

Record history

Published Aug 19, 2026 · Last refreshed Oct 22, 2026