← Back to results
Vulnerability record · public intelligence
CVE-2026-63265
HIGH

Joomla Extension - regularlabs.com - Inconsistent CSRF token checks / privilege checks in various Regular Labs extension AJAX endpoints

Published Jul 22, 2026 · Updated Nov 3, 2026

Severity · CVSSHIGH · Not scored
Known exploitationNot listed
EPSS / likelihood0.18%
QFinch risk scoreNot available

Original summary

Normalized public record · Updated Nov 3, 2026

Joomla Extension - regularlabs.com - Inconsistent CSRF token checks / privilege checks in various Regular Labs extension AJAX endpoints

Publisher and source text is retained separately from QFinch interpretation.

QFinch assessment

Joomla Extension - regularlabs.com - Inconsistent CSRF token checks / privilege checks in various Regular Labs extension AJAX endpoints - Privileged Regular Labs AJAX endpoints did not consistently require valid CSRF tokens, matching component/item permissions and trusted server-generated form configuration. Authenticated lower-privileged users or CSRF attacks could invoke lookups or mutations outside their authorization.

Evidence: public source records

Affected products

Affected scope reported by the available public evidence
Affected package, product or rangeFix status
Consult the referenced vendor advisory for affected versions.Consult source advisory

Matching a version is only one part of assessing exposure. QFinch has not assessed your environment on this public page.

Remediation

Apply the vendor-supported fixed release or mitigation, then verify the affected component is no longer reachable.

  1. Confirm the affected product and reachable code path exist in your environment.
  2. Apply the vendor-supported patch or mitigation from the primary advisory.
  3. Rescan the exact deployed revision and retain verification evidence.
Review primary references

Evidence coverage

FIRST-EPSSCVE-LIST-V5NVD-MODIFIED
SSVC priority
MEDIUM
Confidence
Not available
Aliases
None reported

Scores appear only when corresponding evidence exists. Missing data is never interpreted as zero risk.

Sources and record history

  1. regularlabs.com ↗

Record history

Published Jul 22, 2026 · Last refreshed Nov 3, 2026