← Back to results
Vulnerability record · public intelligence
CVE-2026-107722
CRITICAL

fast-jwt: Incomplete patch of CVE-2026-34950: Non-whitespace key-prefix re-enables RSA→HS256 algorithm confusion

Published Oct 8, 2026 · Updated Nov 3, 2026

Severity · CVSSCRITICAL · Not scored
Known exploitationNot listed
EPSS / likelihood0.36%
QFinch risk scoreNot available

Original summary

Normalized public record · Updated Nov 3, 2026

fast-jwt: Incomplete patch of CVE-2026-34950: Non-whitespace key-prefix re-enables RSA→HS256 algorithm confusion

Publisher and source text is retained separately from QFinch interpretation.

QFinch assessment

The fix for CVE-2026-34950 (CVSS 9.1, released in v6.2.0) is incomplete. It adds key.trim() to the PEM-detection path in src/crypto.js, but String.prototype.trim() only strips characters classified as whitespace by the ECMAScript specification. The subsequent ^-anchored regex (/^-----BEGIN(?: (RSA))? PUBLIC KEY-----/) still requires the PEM header at position 0 — so any non-whitespace leading byte (control chars, zero-width unicode, comments, HTTP-style headers, PGP wrappers) bypasses detection and falls through to the HMAC verification path, using the RSA public key as the HMAC shared secret. Net result: the exact same RSA→HS256 algorithm-confusion attack the original CVE addressed is fully re-enabled with a slightly different leading byte. Attack prerequisites are identical to CVE-2026-34950: attacker knows the target's public RSA key (which is public by definition), and the target loads that key from a source whose content may have a non-whitespace prefix (DB column with corrupted encoding, YAML config with inline comment, copy-paste from formatted document, etc.). Verified on fast-jwt@6.2.2 (latest as of 2026-04-23) with a 10-line PoC.

Potential impact

1. Authentication bypass — attacker forges arbitrary JWT claims (admin, tenant-id, user-id) accepted by any server using fast-jwt 6.2.x without an algorithms allowlist AND loading its verification key from a source that may contain non-whitespace prefix bytes. 2. Severity-parity with CVE-2026-34950 — attack chain, prerequisites, exploitation ease, and impact are identical; only the trigger byte differs. The fix addressed one trigger (whitespace) rather than the class (any surrounding content before -----BEGIN). 3. Broad fast-jwt deployment — default JWT backend of @fastify/jwt; used by many Fastify-based Node.js APIs.

Technical context

Post-patch code (src/crypto.js, lines ~74-171 in performDetectPublicKeyAlgorithms): The bug: String.prototype.trim() only strips whitespace (U+0009-U+000D, U+0020, U+00A0, U+1680, U+2000-U+200A, U+2028-U+2029, U+202F, U+205F, U+3000, U+FEFF). Non-whitespace leading bytes keep the PEM header off position 0, the ^-anchored regex fails, and execution falls through to the HMAC path with key being used as the shared secret. The attacker controls the token signature (signed with the same public key) and the verifier accepts. Identical root cause as CVE-2026-34950 — the fix was textually narrow (whitespace only) rather than addressing the class (any surrounding content).

Evidence: public source records

Affected products

Affected scope reported by the available public evidence
Affected package, product or rangeFix status
Consult the referenced vendor advisory for affected versions.Consult source advisory

Matching a version is only one part of assessing exposure. QFinch has not assessed your environment on this public page.

Remediation

Apply the vendor-supported fixed release or mitigation, then verify the affected component is no longer reachable.

  1. Confirm the affected product and reachable code path exist in your environment.
  2. Apply the vendor-supported patch or mitigation from the primary advisory.
  3. Rescan the exact deployed revision and retain verification evidence.
Review primary references

Evidence coverage

FIRST-EPSSCVE-LIST-V5
SSVC priority
MEDIUM
Confidence
Not available
Aliases
None reported

Scores appear only when corresponding evidence exists. Missing data is never interpreted as zero risk.

Sources and record history

  1. Security advisory ↗
  2. Source repository ↗
  3. Patch commit ↗
  4. Source repository ↗

Record history

Published Oct 8, 2026 · Last refreshed Nov 3, 2026